Essay Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic - 2140 Words

Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic Socrates and Thrasymachus have a dialogue in Chapter 2 of Republic which progresses from a discussion of the definition of morality, to an understanding of the expertise of ruling, and eventually to a debate on the state of human nature. The Thrasymachian view of human nature has interesting implications in regards to Thomas Nagel’s ideal of egalitarianism, and Barbara Ehrenreich’s discontentment with the economic disparity in our democratic society. Although Thrasymachus is thwarted in conversation, Glaucon finds the outcome not entirely conclusive and directs Socrates to proving that morality, in and of itself, is a worthwhile pursuit. Thrasymachus opens the discussion with Socrates†¦show more content†¦(Republic 339c) In defining ‘right’ and ‘moral’ on such grounds, it is clear that he holds a radically different view than Socrates. Socrates’ rebuttal cites that Thrasymachus’ claim is inconsistent. Socrates claims that morality is not necessarily the advantage of the stronger party as Thrasymachus claimed because rulers could make laws that serve as disadvantages. Socrates says, â€Å"you have agreed that it is right to do things which are not to the advantage of the government and the stronger party. When the rulers mistakenly issue orders which are bad for themselves, and since you claim that it is right for people to act in conformity with all the government’s orders, then†¦ doesn’t it necessarily follow that it is right to do the opposite of what your position affirmed?† (Republic 339e) In giving this line of reasoning, Socrates has not taken into account that Thrasymachus’ claim is based on morality being subjective, created by those in power. The question is then begged of Thrasymachus, whether or not he views the stronger party as being fallible. Thrasymachus replies to both Socrates and the begged question by making his defense in regards to expertise, claiming that the profession of ‘ruling’ is the expertise of creating laws for the advantage of the government. Thrasymachus replies, â€Å"do you describe someone who makes mistakes about his patients as a doctor in virtue ofShow MoreRelatedThe Ethical Egoist: Whats the Problem in Plato’s The Republic, Socrates824 Words   |  3 PagesIn Plato’s The Republic, Socrates tries to explain the value of justice to man. Other educated Athenians challenge him, however Socrates pokes holes in all of their statements. Socrates argues that there are many problems with their views on social philosophy, especially when it comes to Thrasymachus’ idea of ethical egoism. Plato delivers his view of justice through Socrates when he responds to Thrasy machus, Glaucon, and Cephalus on the issue. Throughout the discussion, Plato never argues againstRead MoreThe Ethical Egoist in Platos Republic Essay989 Words   |  4 Pagescooperation and, therefore, clearly introduces a significant political problem. I believe that the best example of ethical egoism is displayed in Book I of Platos The Republic. In this Book, Plato introduces the idea of ethical egoism, explains the political problem posed by it, and addresses the problem through the words of Socrates. I will use this paper to explain and clarify the arguments for and against the concept of ethical egoism, with specific focus on the political problem it poses andRead MoreSocrates Argument Of The Just And Unjust. Plato s Republic Essay898 Words   |  4 Pagesreject Socrates arguments against Thrasymachus account of the just and unjust in Plato s Republic, and, in doing so, show that Thrasymachus account is in fact a coherent and plausible account of justice. I begin by describing the context of Socrates and Thrasymachus argument and what it would take for Socrates to overcome the Thrasymachian account. I then describe the Thrasymachian account and argue for its coherence. I attack the Socratic method of deconstructing Thrasymachus argumentRead More The Importance of Thrasymachus in Plato’s Republic Essay923 Words   |  4 PagesThe Importance of Thrasymachus in Plato’s Republic   Ã‚      Dr. Malters’s comments: This student does two things quite remarkable for an undergraduate student. In his compact essay, not only does he display an in-depth understanding of complex perspectives on justice put forth by the protagonist Socrates, he deftly explains how Plato has artfully made rude objections by a seemingly minor character early in the dialogue function as a structuring device for nearly all the important ideas examinedRead MoreIn Plato’S Republic, Thrasymachus Asserts That Justice1431 Words   |  6 PagesIn Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus asserts that justice is the interest of the ruling part in a political community. This is proven wrong in many ways in Book II. Socrates disassembles this theory using undisputed definitions of wisdom and virtue. These definitions of wisdom and virtue are rendered by a ruler’s personal biases. A ruler has a natural internal motivation to gain undisputed expertise of their craft. A ruler of a political community does act through personal motivations, but by doingRead More Thrasymachus Perspective on Human Nature Essay1298 Words   |  6 PagesThrasymachus Perspective on Human Nature Thrasymachus perspective of human nature is that we all seek to maximize power, profit and possessions. He gives the argument that morality is not an objective truth but rather a creation of the stronger (ruling) party to serve its own advantage. Therefore definitions of just and unjust, right and wrong, moral and immoral are all dependent upon the decree of the ruling party. Thrasymachus argues that acting morally, in accordance withRead More Justice In Book I Of The Republic Essay example889 Words   |  4 Pages The Republic of Plato begins in a similar fashion that many other Platonic dialogues begin, with that of a question. The conversation between Socrates and the aged Cephalus becomes a philosophical discussion of what advantages money has brought to Cephalus life. Cephalus replies that money has allowed him quot;to tell the truth and pay ones debtsquot; (331 b). Nevertheless, Socrates believes this does not portray an accurate description of what justice is. The rest of the first book is a discussionRead MoreSocrates Definition Of Justice Essay1390 Words   |  6 Pagestheir society functions in an orderly fashion. In Book 1 of The Republic, Plato attempts to define exactly what justice is. To help determine this definition, he speaks through the philosopher protagonist of Socrates. Justice is first brought up in The Republic during Socrates’ trip to Piraeus. While traveling Socrates ends up gathering with his interlocutors and together, they talk about justice and how one would define it. Socrates debates with the men about the definition of justice and is presentedRead MoreJustice Is A Philosophical Concept Of Relevance Or Truth901 Words   |  4 Pagesword ‘justice’ in translation of Plato’s Republic and other texts of that era is fundamentally different than the notion of justice in ethics today. One of the foundations of our society is the presence and function of justice. It is a subject often taken for granted without much thought. What is justice? According to Thrasymachus – the main character in The Republic, he asserts that justice is an important good. As stated in The Republic, Thrasymachus’ slated argument consists of three partsRead MoreJustice in Platos The Republic Essay527 Words   |  3 Pages Plato creates a seemingly invincible philosopher in The Republic. Socrates is able to refute all arguments presented before him with ease. The discussion on justice in Book I of The Republic is one such example. Socrates successfully refutes each different view of justice presented by Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus. Socrates has not given us a definitive definition of justice, nor has he refuted all views of justice, but as far as we are concerned in Book I, he is able to break down the